Cleanups for the m68k backend

[Bernardo Innocenti]

On Tuesday 08 July 2003 10:03, Gunther Nikl wrote:

 > >  So it seems it's not a problem for the Amiga. Now the only reason
 > > to keep the MIT syntax alive is that you do like it. What do you
 > > care about assembly automatically generated by GCC for as?
 >
 >   My GAS version doesn't understand Motorola syntax.

 You mean on the Amiga? Mine does and it's pretty old.

 >   BTW, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-07/msg00454.html shows that
 > OpenBSD is probably using a GAS version that doesn't support Motorola
 > syntax.

 Yes, I'm afraid it's the only obstacle left. I've asked Karel Gardas
to look at the documentation for as and confirm it.

 I still don't understand why the OpenBSD people didn't upgrade their
assembler the same way the NetBSD people did. Their system
requirements are pretty much the same.

-- 
  // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/  http://www.develer.com/

Please don't send Word attachments - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html