Zack Weinberg wrote: >If the first one isn't a suitable definition of uintptr_t for some >target, the ABI is broken. (I know C99 allows >sizeof(long) < sizeof(void *). C99 is wrong.) > > Oh bah. C has allowed this forever. Not to mention sizeof(void(*)()) != sizeof(void*). Does that mean C has always been wrong? -- Brane ÄŒibej <brane@xbc.nu> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/