C++ demangler horrors
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Tue Jul 1 13:47:00 GMT 2003
On Jun 28, 2003, "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 07:59:00AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
>> My patch doesn't requrie it. But some people don't like the way I solved
>> the problem with
>>
>> ar -d ....
>> ar rc ....
It's not about not liking. Consider a parallel build in which someone
is linking with libiberty while demangler goes and modifies it. Bad
idea. And splitting this into demangler like this won't fix it:
> all:
> $(MAKE) -C ../libiberty [new_demangler|old_demangler]
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
More information about the Gcc
mailing list