tree-ssa status

[Paul Brook]

On Thursday 27 February 2003 8:57 pm, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> writes:
> > But it seems that we'll be stuck with at least one front end that will
> > probably never be able to do function-at-a-time compilation (g77).
>
> Isn't g95 targeted for the 3.5 time frame as well?  If so, we ought to
> be able to scrap g77 entirely.

While g95 may be nominally targeted for this timeframe, I very much doubt it 
will be considered an acceptable replacement for g77 until some time 
afterwards. A working g95 and a g95 which is as good as (or better than) 
g77 for fortran 77 code are two totally different things.

Paul Brook