tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)
Daniel Berlin
dberlin@dberlin.org
Thu Feb 27 20:45:00 GMT 2003
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:46 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>
>> There is a difference between things that "work fine" and things that
>> "are ready".
>>
> Yup.
>
>> What, for example, is the compile time performance on the branch?
>> SPEC
>> results compared to mainline? If I correctly interpret Diego's SPEC
>> tester results, it does not quite look like it's there yet.
>>
> Yes, we are not quite there yet.
>
> Since you brought it up, I got curious and gathered a few stats.
> This is how the branch looks today in terms of compile time
> compared with mainline:
>
> - All times are in seconds.
> - All the compilers are built with ENABLE_CHECKING.
> - Bootstrap times are for all default languages (C, C++, Java,
> Fortran and ObjC).
Is this still without copy propagation, or is that in a tree you used
here?
More information about the Gcc
mailing list