Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c

[Mike Stump]

On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 08:07 AM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> If we do this, I'd prefer to do it only for Darwin.  If someone set's
> it intentionally, we should honor it if possible.  Since Darwin
> ignores the limit, resetting it doesn't hurt there.
>
> What's the default hard limit shipped on Darwin?  I.e. is it high
> enough such that resetting rlim_cur to rlim_max fixes the issue?

8 [ tilt your head for that ]

Yes.