Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up

Phil Edwards phil@jaj.com
Tue Feb 25 18:34:00 GMT 2003


On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 12:24:58PM -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > Op di 25-02-2003, om 18:47 schreef Phil Edwards:
> > 
> > Yeah, just a "burn-on-demand" availability should be enough.
> 
> Would it be sufficient for a cron job to make an tarball of the
> CVS repository available for download say once a week? 
> 
> Was the "mail a CD" offer just to avoid the bandwidth issue?

I think so.  Once the repo is initially downloaded/installed/whatever, rsync
does a most excellent job of keeping the repo up to to date with minimal
bandwidth usage.  So a snailmailed CD would truly be a one-time setup.

Heck, we could just burn one copy and then each person mails it to
the next.  :-)


> > The current rsync repository is almost 1GB (it was +/- 950 MB on
> > December 2, 2002, and we have a new branch now and a new C++ parser), so
> > unless you can compress it to about 50% of that, you're not even going
> > to be able to burn it on a single CD.
> 
> bzip2 is usually pretty good at compressing things so if you could
> get 2-3x compression, it should fit.

It's nearly all text.  Last time I had to do that to the repo I got superb
compression ratios.

Besides, what with filename conventions vs burning software, it'd probably
be most portable to create a single repo.tar.bz2 file, and then burn that
to the disc rather than trying to mirror the structure.


> > You should stop drinking redbull then :-)

Bite your tongue, that stuff would kill a horse at fifty paces.  Coffee!  :-)


Phil

-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams



More information about the Gcc mailing list