GCC 3.3 release criteria

[Dan Kegel]

Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> <h3>Applications</h3>
> 
> <p>It is important that the compiler is verified on real-world
> applications.  The following applications represent a mix of low-level
> and high-level code, of numerical and logical programs, and of
> different programming languages.</p>
> 
> <tr><td><a href="http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html">ACE</a></td>
>     <td>C++</td>
>     <td>5.2</td>
>     <td><a href="http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html">
>         ACE (download)</a></td>
>     <td> </td>
> </tr>
...

Can we add Samba to the list?  It is quite widely used, and 3.2.2
currently has a Samba regression at -O2 on Sparc that has
caused some public wailing and gnashing of teeth.  See bug 8726
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8726

If you agree, here's HTML that might do:

<tr><td><a href="http://www.samba.org">Samba</a></td>
     <td>C</td>
     <td>2.2.7a</td>
     <td><a href="http://us2.samba.org/samba/download.html">Samba (download)</a></td>
     <td> </td>
</tr>

Thanks,
Dan
(not subscribed)