Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
Joel Sherrill
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com
Fri Feb 21 18:31:00 GMT 2003
Janis Johnson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:20:03PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> >
> > Just one week before the planned release of GCC 3.3, the number of
> > high-priority bugs for 3.3 is going *up* instead of down!
> >
> > Mostly thanks to Wolfgang and Janis, for quite a few PRs the patches
> > causing the bugs have been located. Unfortunately, hardly any of these
> > PRs were picked up by by somebody for fixing.
>
> Several other people have been helping out with this lately, too.
>
> Fortunately, your statement about hardly any of these bugs being fixed
> is not correct; quite a few of them have been fixed, some by the person
> who introduced the regression and some by others. Here's a summary,
> which is missing recent reports from other people:
>
I would add a number of embedded targets (m68k, i386, sh, mips64orion,
and hppa1.1) which built in gcc 3.2.2 no longer completely compile:
+ PR9255 - m68k-elf and -rtems don't finish build
Peter Barada posted a fix to combine.c
+ no PR - sh-coff, -elf, -rtems, and -rtemself fail
during install trying to make multilib dirs
+ no PR - i386-elf and i386-rtems don't build without
a patch
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-02/msg00925.html)
+ no PR - mips64orion-elf and -rtems fail with -march=mips1 not
compatible
with the selected ABI message
+ no PR - hppa1.1-proelf fails to build with message
during configure of newlib that xgcc doesn't make
executables
Those are just the ones where "it used to build and now it doesn't".
A few targets saw no progress fixing problems and some just saw
ICE's during bootstrap move around.
I haven't filed PRs on the bottom 4 because I just now have a complete
set of cross build logs to look at.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
More information about the Gcc
mailing list