PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.

[Toon Moene]

Neil Booth wrote:
> Toon Moene wrote:-
> 
> 
>>>>Apparently I still don't understand how this piece of c-opts.c
>>>
>>works,
>>
>>>>because the attached patch doesn't solve the problem.
>>>
>>>How does it not work?
>>
>>cc1 still gives the warning:
>>
>>unknown register: line-length-none.

> Hmm.  That's coming from something else; definitely not C switch
> handling.

Definitely.  So the question is: how do we prevent the passing on of 
this switch to the rest of cc1 in case cc1 is called with the -E switch ....

In f771, we just return -1 from ffe_decode_option - does that mean that 
setting `result' to -1 in c_common_decode_option will have the same effect ?

Thanks in advance,

-- 
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc-g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)