3.3 target date?

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Our testing at SuSE showed that 3.3 is in a pretty good shape.

That's interesting, because we still have 77 regressions in 3.3 listed
in GNATS:

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?synopsis=3.3&priority=high&responsible=&state=&ignoreclosed=Ignore%20Closed&class=&submitter_id=&originator=&release=&columns=category&columns=state&columns=class&columns=responsible&columns=synopsis&displaydate=Display%20Current%20Date&cmd=submit%20query&sortby=Responsible&.cgifields=category&.cgifields=state&.cgifields=confidential&.cgifields=severity&.cgifields=ignoreclosed&.cgifields=responsible&.cgifields=class&.cgifields=submitter_id&.cgifields=displaydate&.cgifields=columns&.cgifields=priority

And some 26 regressions in 3.2 (some of which might also apply to 3.3);
plus a significant compile-time performance problem.

> I'd like to see a March 1 release,

I suppose that all those 77(+26) regressions are problems real users had
with their code bases, so we should at least trim this down significantly.

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry"   pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at   http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/