PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.

[Toon Moene]

Neil Booth wrote:

> Paul Brook wrote:-

>>Apparently not. I thought I'd checked that, but when I try it now it doesn't 
>>work:(
>>
>>You could replace '%(cc1_options)' with
>>'%(cpp_unique_options) %1 %{m*} %{std*} %{ansi} %{W*&pedantic*} %{w} \
>> %{O*} %{undef}'
>>(taken from gcc.c, removing -f)
>>
>>However this stops any -f options getting passed to the propocessor. AFAIK 
>>cc1 -E doesn't use any -f options anyway. Any -f options it does need could 
>>of course be added explicitly.

> Nope, cc1 -E uses all -f options.

OK, that means that I have to go with your original suggestion; 
unfortunately, that one wasn't exactly clear to me - what function do I 
have to supply (and where ?) and what should it do ?

Thanks in advance,

-- 
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc-g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)