GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86

[J.D. Bronson]

At 11:51 AM 2/18/2003, Joe Buck wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:16:01AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> >   Has the SC decided on any future release from the gcc-3_2-branch?
>
>There has been some discussion.  It does appear that we're going to need
>3.2.3.  I had been resisting this because I've been worried about how
>well we can execute with three branches going at once, but clearly 3.3
>is going to have to slip more; we need to improve its compile speed for
>-O0 at least some for it to be releasable.  Also, clearly there are some
>significant problems still with 3.2.2.  If it were only packaging problems
>(missing info files), then 3.2.2a (just adding info files) would be
>a possibility, but we have a few serious fixes that should be applied.


So is there a recommended fix for solaris?

>