dynamic/shared libraries for darwin?

[Mike Stump]

On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 08:17  AM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> is anybody working on dynamic libraries for darwin?

C (such as libgcc) might be reasonable. But bear in mind, we have 
binary compatibilities requirements that span decades, not just one 
major release.  We avoided shipping C++ libraries in the past as we 
didn't have the resources and time to devote to the problem.  In fact, 
we avoid C++ system libraries, as it isn't abi stable.

I don't think anyone around here it doing much.