[PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics
Phil Edwards
phil@jaj.com
Fri Feb 14 04:45:00 GMT 2003
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:04:46PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> | This thread is impossible two follow,
>
> I would like to second Neil here: Although I enjoy reading
> contributions by Robert Dewar and Richard Kenner, I find the failure
> of their mailers to insert appropriate references very discouraging to
> the point that, most of the time, I just press the 'D' key and pass on
> much readable threads.
>
> :-(
You both have much more patience than I do; this thread has been going
straight to the 'delete' bin ever since I logged in and saw that the
"thread tree" was one long line, straight down.
It's hard enough to decode and mentally reorganize the output of
-fdump-translation-unit. There's no excuse for needing to do the same
thing to email.
Phil
--
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
- Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002
More information about the Gcc
mailing list