The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken

[cgd@broadcom.com]

At Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:49:09 +0000 (UTC), "Bruce Stephens" wrote:
> "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > I suggest the more radical step of removing most or all of the
> > modules.
> 
> This is more of a generic comment than a comment about this specific
> case, but modules are useful for users (when the modules are kept up
> to date, obviously).

"and are not broken."  8-)

see, for instance:

	http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-12/msg01643.html

8-)


chris