[tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)

[Daniel Berlin]

On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 03:36  PM, Diego Novillo wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
>
>>
>> One more difference between the code generated by the tree-ssa
>> compiler: it inlines fewer mem* functions.
>>
> Yes, because the estimate that relates number of trees to number
> of RTL insns is wrong for GIMPLE.  Dan Berlin mentioned that he
> wanted to increase it, I don't know if he ever got around to
> doing it.
>

No, not yet.
I can do it when i get home.

Dan, if you want to test before then, simply change INSNS_PER_STMT in 
tree-inline.c to 3, rather than 10.

The actual average insns per GIMPLE statement was 3.something or other 
over all the code i ran a statistic gatherer through.


> Diego.