cache misses in gcc 3.3
law@redhat.com
law@redhat.com
Mon Feb 10 16:24:00 GMT 2003
In message <20030210161232.GA6500@averell>, Andi Kleen writes:
>As far as I can see Neil is doing a good thing by attacking the C parser.
>Hopefully CSE can be fixed too - I assume tree-ssa will do that eventually?
The plan is for tree-ssa (namely dominator based optimizations within tree
ssa) to largely replace the functionality of the existing cse implementation
(specifically all the path following which cse.c does so amazingly
inefficiently).
jeff
More information about the Gcc
mailing list