cache misses in gcc 3.3

law@redhat.com law@redhat.com
Mon Feb 10 16:24:00 GMT 2003


In message <20030210161232.GA6500@averell>, Andi Kleen writes:
 >As far as I can see Neil is doing a good thing by attacking the C parser.
 >Hopefully CSE can be fixed too - I assume tree-ssa will do that eventually?
The plan is for tree-ssa (namely dominator based optimizations within tree
ssa) to largely replace the functionality of the existing cse implementation
(specifically all the path following which cse.c does so amazingly 
inefficiently).

jeff




More information about the Gcc mailing list