[Gomp-discuss] Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end
Per Bothner
per@bothner.com
Mon Feb 10 05:42:00 GMT 2003
David Edelsohn wrote:
> Unfortunately, this is a public standard.
There are all kinds of "public" standards.
> Somehow we need to be compatible.
"We" only need to be compatible if we make
a comittment to implementing OpenMP. I don't
think we should make any comittment to accepting
an OpenMP implementation in the offical CVS tree.
Of course I'm not suggesting that a technical
discussion about the best way to the implement
OpneMP in Gcc is inappropriate; but it should
not any support for the design.
Scott Robert Ladd wrote:
> A concept of OpenMP is that a program maintains its logic whether its is
> compiled for serial or parallel execution. Thus the use of pragmas, which
> can be ignored (or warned about) by any non-OpenMP compiler.
The "official" Gcc line has always been that #pragmas are
generally a bad idea. A major reason is that #pragmas
cannot be created by macros.
--
--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/per/
More information about the Gcc
mailing list