Comparison of gcc 3.2.1 and gcc 3.2.2-20030203 with gdb

[Janis Johnson]

On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:53:23PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> I'll start posting regularly to gcc-testresults.  I can file bug
> reports, too, when gcc does something that makes the gdb results
> regress.  Naturally that is a delicate area because when gcc+gdb do not
> work together the fault could be on either side, or both sides.
> 
> I'm tracking gcc-3_2-branch, gcc-3_3-branch, and HEAD (I'm about to
> stop tracking gcc-3_2-branch).  I do a spin every 4-10 days.

Please consider adding an entry about your testing to the "Current
Efforts" list in http://gcc.gnu.org/testing/index.html.  In CVS, that
page is wwwdocs/htdocs/testing/index.html.  Mention which platform
you're testing.

Janis