GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "David" == David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> writes:

David> Instead of the development plan being driven solely by dates, I
David> would like to see some technology goals.  For instance, we want
David> to merge in 3.4-bib, itanium-branch, pch-branch, rtlopt-branch,
David> and new-regalloc.  We allow those branches in plan to be merged
David> after Stage 1 and after the GCC 3.3 release, if necessary.
David> That's controlled instability, as opposed to considering any
David> major patch far into the GCC 3.4 development cycle.  We don't
David> want a deluge of patches right after the GCC 3.3 release, but
David> we also shouldn't make it so hard for developers.

This sounds good to me.  What's the next step?  Maybe suggest a patch
to the development plan?

Tom