Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?

[Phil Edwards]

On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 08:37:00PM +0100, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> Because I was reading the C++ FAQ LITE yesterday. :-)
> I thought his definitions were apt.
> They are strong words though; maybe I should drop them.

The FSF and RMS have some psychological hangup with calling code "legal" or
"illegal".  (My own opinion is that, as long as the ISO language standard
uses it, RMS can take a leap.)


Phil

-- 
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
                                                 - Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002