hppa-linux regressions and 3.2.2 release

[Joe Buck]

On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 07:25:25PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote:
> As to Joe's point, this doesn't happen on 3.3 because there isn't an
> empty block at the end of the insn stream.  There is always a code_label
> in the insn stream.  As a result, the preceding loop doesn't ever reach
> the end of the insn stream.  If the presence of a code label is guaranteed,
> then the null check in the preceeding for loop can probably be removed.
> I don't know why 3.2 and 3.3 differ in this respect but I seem to
> recall problems with label usage counts at one time.

I only raised the issue because we weren't seeing the failure on 3.3.
I just wanted someone knowledgeable to check.