GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4

Jan Hubicka jh@suse.cz
Sat Feb 1 01:43:00 GMT 2003


> 
> 
> --On Friday, January 31, 2003 04:54:29 PM -0600 Benjamin Kosnik 
> <bkoz@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> >Agreed. Seems to be a common concern.
> >
> >Mark, I think keeping at least a month in between the two events is
> >advisable.
> 
> That actually is our normal plan.
> 
> But it's a bit hard to have it both ways -- if we can't commit to a
> 3.3 date (as you suggested yesterday that we should not) then we can't
> really schedule the 3.4 cutoff.
> 
> But, we have been in 3.4 stage one for quite some time now, and Geoff
> and I both managed to get our work ready at that time.  Stage 1 isn't
> really for *developing* new major changes, it's for *integrating* them.

We would like to integrate the rtlopt branch as well.  The changes are
already developed for quite some time, so I believe they are ready for
being added into mainline now.  Hope it will fir the schedule.

Honza
> 
> We could just close the mainline during a release, but it's very clear
> that nobody wants to do that -- we want to make sure development can
> happen while a release is being prepared.  That inherently means that
> there's going to be some division of people's time between the two
> branches.
> 
> -- 
> Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
> CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com



More information about the Gcc mailing list