GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
Jan Hubicka
jh@suse.cz
Sat Feb 1 01:43:00 GMT 2003
>
>
> --On Friday, January 31, 2003 04:54:29 PM -0600 Benjamin Kosnik
> <bkoz@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Agreed. Seems to be a common concern.
> >
> >Mark, I think keeping at least a month in between the two events is
> >advisable.
>
> That actually is our normal plan.
>
> But it's a bit hard to have it both ways -- if we can't commit to a
> 3.3 date (as you suggested yesterday that we should not) then we can't
> really schedule the 3.4 cutoff.
>
> But, we have been in 3.4 stage one for quite some time now, and Geoff
> and I both managed to get our work ready at that time. Stage 1 isn't
> really for *developing* new major changes, it's for *integrating* them.
We would like to integrate the rtlopt branch as well. The changes are
already developed for quite some time, so I believe they are ready for
being added into mainline now. Hope it will fir the schedule.
Honza
>
> We could just close the mainline during a release, but it's very clear
> that nobody wants to do that -- we want to make sure development can
> happen while a release is being prepared. That inherently means that
> there's going to be some division of people's time between the two
> branches.
>
> --
> Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
> CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
More information about the Gcc
mailing list