GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4

[Joe Buck]

On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:11:56PM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
> Please see my reply to Kenner and Mark on the subject of better
> alternatives.  

Claims that an alternative is better need to be backed up.  If your
"continuous release management" scheme is better, please point to
a sizable free software project that uses it.  If you cannot, then
it may not be socially responsible to risk GCC for the sake of your
experiment.

As for the rest, I have no interest in any effort to "put our foot down".