bugs fixed on the tree-ssa

[Mark Mitchell]

> I agree. Suspended looks like an appropriate state for me. Let's just wait
> until the merge really happens, and then we can revisit the bugs. Meanwhile, it
> might be useful to add the testcases for the bugs to the branch, so that we can
> reasonably sure that they stay fixed.

The right solution is clear: there should be a per-branch state for
bugs, or, equivalently, bug-state keywords on a per-branch basis.

We really don't know yet when tree-ssa will be merged into the mainline,
and if it doesn't happen until 3.6, say, then we will have to look at
these bugs that have been fixed on the tree-ssa branch.

-- 
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
CodeSourcery, LLC