bugs fixed on the tree-ssa

[Richard Guenther]

Joe Buck wrote:

> My suggestion is as follows: if it's a non-regression, and we don't plan
> to try to fix it for 3.4, marking it as fixed in tree-ssa seems right.

I don't think it is wise to mark bugs in released or to-be-released gcc
versions fixed in a branch that is not for sure going to be integrated in
any forseeable release, no?  It would be better to only suspend it, I
think, as otherwise, in the odd case that tree-ssa doesnt get merged,
we're not missing them.  Or maybe even add a state
fixed-in-development-branch or such would be useful here?

Richard.

--
Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/