[tree-ssa] Statement with no effect warning

[law@redhat.com]

In message <200312161805.12816.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>, Steven Bosscher 
writes:
 >On Tuesday 16 December 2003 17:48, law@redhat.com wrote:
 >> In message <20031216160527.GN2199@kam.mff.cuni.cz>, Jan Hubicka writes:
 >>  >Ignore the comments about non-checking bootstrap.  As I've checked
 >>  >Diego's machines did run earlier than I've commited the patch.  Hope
 >>  >that all the problems are fixed by now.
 >>
 >> What I'm far more concerned about is the fact that a patch which didn't
 >> bootstrap was checked into the tree to start with.
 >
 >Sometimes it unfortunately just happens.  In case you forgot, only
 >yesterday Diego broke bootstrap, and also remember:
Yes, but it is happening with alarming regularity.  Diego has reverted
some of Jan's patches and so have I.


 >2003-11-26  Diego Novillo  <dnovillo@redhat.com>
 >
 >        Revert
 >
 >        2003-11-25  Jeff law  <law@redhat.com>
 >
 >(which, FYI, happened to break bootstrap for me.)
And if you recall, that bootstrapped for me with and without checking on
i686-pc-linux-gnu.  I couldn't get it to fail unless I was on an alpha.

jeff