[tree-ssa] Maintaining/representing def-use/use-def information
Daniel Berlin
dberlin@dberlin.org
Mon Dec 15 21:32:00 GMT 2003
On Dec 15, 2003, at 4:14 PM, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> No, we don't. We don't have any concept of "defining variable" or
>> "versions" at all. Though all SSA construction papers talk about
>> building
>> versions of source variables, once you start doing transformations,
>> that
>> idea becomes quickly meaningless.
>
> except for ssa-pre, that requires the original variable names.
Uh, only to determine lexical equivalence of expressions.
> I still
> consider it an indication that there is something rotten with the
> optimization, but did not get the idea how to make it better so far.
>
Give me value numbers, and it'll do it based on value numbers.
>
More information about the Gcc
mailing list