Steering committee request regarding gcc's bugzilla
Joseph S. Myers
jsm@polyomino.org.uk
Fri Dec 12 18:31:00 GMT 2003
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> There's only one urlbase, regardless of product, so unless we use one
> of gcc.gnu.org's other aliases, that's what the urls will be printed
> as.
How hard would it be for different URLs to select different products and
hide the components/versions/milestones for other products by default?
I.e., GCC and binutils have completely different version numbering
scehemes and components that make sense, so it would save some bug
reporter confusion if when reporting GCC bugs they only see possible
version/component values that make sense for GCC. (But for the benefits
of a joint database to be there, it would need to be possible to move a
bug from the gcc to the binutils product and at the same time change GCC
version/component/milestone into binutils ones.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm@polyomino.org.uk
More information about the Gcc
mailing list