[c++] Another question about demangler output

[Zack Weinberg]

Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:
> "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:
> | If this is the case, then the alternatives would seem to be either
> | printing out demangled expressions that are invalid C++ but
> | comprehensible to a human, or else making up names as necessary and
> | printing their definitions too.  The latter seems like too much
> | trouble, and liable to confuse humans more than the former.
>
> Well, if it is invlid C++, it is not obvious that it would be
> comprehensible to a human :-)

Good point.  Do you have a better idea?

zw