[c++] Another question about demangler output

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) writes:

[...]

| (4) BB::operator __typeof__(int (*)()) ()
| 
|     I suggest this improvement to (3).  This is my favorite.
| 
| (5) _ZN2BBcvPFivEEv
| 
|     Hey, it's an option, but I don't like it and I doubt that anybody
|     else likes it either.
| 
| My preference order is (4) > (3) > (2) > (1) > (5).

I suppose we can't do better given current state.

-- Gaby