Question on Makefile.in's program_transform_cross_name

[Kelley Cook]

Kelley Cook wrote:

> Is my analysis of the current situation correct and more importantly if 
> so should GCC_INSTALL_NAME always be the same as GCC_CROSS_NAME?  I 
> think that the answer is yes since configure.in seems to take care of 
> adjusting the sed script to prefix the target name.
> 
> If it is then I can submit a separate patch for cleaning up *_CROSS_NAME 
> the Makefile and */Make-lang.in files.
> 

Here is the cleanup patch to accomplish this.
Tested with:
make install on i686-pc-cygwin (native)
make install on i686-pc-cygwin cross to pentium4-pc-cygwin.

Both work as expected, with one unrelated and pre-existing exception 
regarding gcjh.exe getting doubly transformed into 
pentium4-pc-cygwin-pentium4-pc-cygwin-gcjh.exe for which I'll submit a 
new patch for ASAP.

OK to install?
Kelley Cook
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: cross_name.patch
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20031205/92e8a3a1/attachment.ksh>