Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

[Phil Edwards]

On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 03:48:04PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Phil Edwards <phil@codesourcery.com> writes:
> 
> | Sorry, I just don't see what we gain from calling it 4.x when there's
> | no user-visible change big enough to deserve a bump in the major number.
> 
> Calling the huge infrastructure change on tree-ssa branch "no
> user-visible change big enough" is an exageration.

Huh?  It's /infrastructure/.  Why would users care how the internal guts
are arranged?  They don't, and they shouldn't.

-- 
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
    - Brian W. Kernighan