BIT_ANDTC_EXPR - kill it?

[Josef Zlomek]

> >   operator_name_info [(int) BIT_ANDTC_EXPR].name = "&~";
> > 
> > As I expected, it seems to be X & ~Y.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > What do you think about killing BIT_ANDTC_EXPR ?
> > 
> > There are only few uses of it, majority of them is in something like
> > this:
> > case BIT_AND_EXPR:
> > case BIT_ANDTC_EXPR:
> > case BIT_OR_EXPR:
> >   something;
> >   break;
> 
> It does seem to be unnecessary.  Would you like to make a patch?

Yes, I'll make a patch.

Josef