COND_EXPR lowering patch

[Andrew MacLeod]

On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 08:27, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 03:12, law@redhat.com wrote:
> 
> > Though given that I want to see us incrementally improve things, I do not
> > want to see a mega patch which does both changes at once.
> > 
> > In fact, I'd really like to slow the patches down and get resolution
> > on those which are already outstanding, starting with the LOOP_EXPR
> > patch.  I believe there is a single outstanding issue with it that
> > is preventing it from being installed (the gcov failures).  I'd really
> > like to see that resolved before submission of COND_EXPR lowering.
> > 
> Agreed.  Let's get some closure on the outstanding patches.
> 
Doh.  This entire thread doesn't have tree-ssa in the subject, so I
missed 3/4 of this conversation until now... ( As I clean up my mailbox)
Sorry for any reinventing/hashing I caused :-|

Andrew