[using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make

[Chris Devers]

In section 10.11, "Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make"
we have the following paragraph:

  * Warning when a non-void function value is ignored.

    Coming as I do from a Lisp background, I balk at the idea that
    there is something dangerous about discarding a value. There
    are functions that return values which some callers may find
    useful; it makes no sense to clutter the program with a cast
    to void whenever the value isn't useful.

There's just a bit more axe-grinding from the MIT alum that wrote this
than is strictly necessary, I think :)

Coming from a non-Lisp background, as I assume many of the readers will
be, it's not clear to me what Lisp-wisdom is being alluded to here.
Moreover, the documentation guidelines I've been given to go by indicate
that the text should never be written in the first person like this, so
even if the Lisp sniping has to be in there, it has to be rewritten in
a more neutral 2nd or 3rd person voice.

Here's what I've got for a replacement:

    Think carefully before discarding values.  There are functions
    that return values which some callers may find useful, but it
    makes no sense to clutter the program with a cast to void
    whenever the value isn't useful.

But even that is more "preachy" than I feel is appropriate.

Would anyone care to suggest improvements?




-- 
Chris Devers    cdevers@pobox.com

lexical scope, n.
One of natural language's many risible barriers to disambiguation.
See also HYPHEN.

    -- from _The Computer Contradictionary_, Stan Kelly-Bootle, 1995