new coldfire TARGET_ flags

[Bernardo Innocenti]

On Thursday 21 August 2003 10:24, Gunther Nikl wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Why didn't you use 0x20000 as a MASK_ value? MASK_CFV4 is 0x10000 and
> MASK_CF_HWDIV is 0x40000. Is 0x20000 reserved?

These values were chosen by Peter. I suppose he wanted to reserve one
free slot for MASK_CFV5 when Motorola will do it ;-)

-- 
  // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/  http://www.develer.com/

Please don't send Word attachments - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html