ColdFire/uClinux status update

[Zack Weinberg]

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

>> Question: Is it ok to convert the m68k back-end to use ANSI
>> function argument declarations?
>
> Yes, please!  All patches to use C90 syntax have been pre-approved for 3.4.
> If you would, though, don't just use them for new code; please update the
> entire port.

I'll add that, to make everyone's life easier, it is preferred to do
an entire file or set of files at once.  Also, please do not include
other changes in C90 conversion patches.

zw