m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax

[Per Bothner]

Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Of course I meant to remove the least used one, which is...
> err... mumble mumble... the MIT syntax :-)

The MIT syntax is the one that GNU tools originally supported.
I thought by now gas supports both syntaxes, but are both still
being maintained?  Another question is: which syntax do our
dis-assemblers (in gdb and binutils) emit?  Obviously, our
toolchain should be self-consistent.  It's silly for our
compiler to only support Motorola syntax while gdb emits
(only or by default) MIT syntax or vice versa.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/