3_3-branch: Honor MIN_INLINE_INSNS

[Andreas Jaeger]

Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de> writes:

> [...]
> I'm looking at PR/10679 and get the idea that the testcase is quite 
> artificial. And the failure is caused by the fact that the accounting 
> of instructions is apparently poor. The sum_insns basically should 
> not increase by inlining empty functions ...

This has been changed by Jan Hubicka recently for GCC 3.4, we now have
a much better sizing of functions.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, 90429 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20030815/73c9cb5d/attachment.sig>