On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code

[Mike Stump]

On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 03:45 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Concerning the inlining limits, I believe we should increase them.
>
> Sure, your analysis seems convincing...

I wasn't going to chime in, but...

I'm happy with the above sort of testing/experiments and am happy to 
have them increased.  When we have a balance of complaints for and 
against a change, then we know it is time to fundamentally improve the 
algorithms involved.  It feels to me that we've erred on the too small 
side for a while.

Thanks for doing this work, and thanks to anyone that offers feedback 
on the `right' values to use, and how bad things are, if the defaults 
are right.