biarch gcc
Peter Bergner
bergner@vnet.ibm.com
Tue Aug 12 21:15:00 GMT 2003
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> writes:
>>Secondly, getting header files right is not so easy. Typically, some 32
>>bit headers are different from the corresponding 64 bit header. It's
>>possible to hack around this problem by creating lots of stubs that test
>>__powerpc64__ and then include the real header, or by using esoteric
>>-isystem gcc options. You also need to deal with patched headers
>>installed by fixincludes, which might get in the way of such hacks.
>
>
> The Glibc headers for sparc, s390 and x86_64 were written with that in
> mind and do not have any problems that I'm aware of. What problems
> exactly do you have?
I believe Alan was talking about kernel headers here and not GLIBC headers.
The stub workaround Alan speaks of is the same workaround you (ie, SuSE) used
on SLES8. For example:
cannon% cat /usr/include/asm/unistd.h
#ifndef __PPC_ASM_STUB__UNISTD_H__
#define __PPC_ASM_STUB__UNISTD_H__
#ifdef __powerpc64__
#include <asm-ppc64/unistd.h>
#else
#include <asm-ppc/unistd.h>
#endif
#endif
Peter
More information about the Gcc
mailing list