On inlining in C++

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes:

| > C++ is not Ada and Ada is not C++.  
| > If you want to argue about C++ inline, please do consider C++
| > semantics, practice. 
| 
| My comment was on C++ practice as I see it in the real world.

But you did not answer the question "More convenient way of doing what?"

Inline as I have described is close to what has been documented for
two decades in official C++ manuals.

-- Gaby