tree-ssa internal compiler error
Andrew Pinski
pinskia@physics.uc.edu
Fri Aug 1 19:49:00 GMT 2003
On Friday, Aug 1, 2003, at 14:08 US/Eastern, law@redhat.com wrote:
> I doubt my change would have fixed this kind of bug. This sounds
> more like something is mixing virtual and real operands.
>
> It's _possible_ that propagation into virtual operands could trigger
> this kind of failure -- though that would be an indication that
> something else is buggered up before we copy propagate into virtual
> operands.
>
> I'd be very interested in seeing what the statement in question looks
> like,
> along with its virtual operands. I believe you can get that via
> dump_generic_stmt (i) "i" is a statement in the context where we're
> aborting.
It was fixed after Diego's "Various fixes" went in.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
More information about the Gcc
mailing list