Compilation time (was Re: GCC 3.3)

[law@redhat.com]

In message <1051729729.15231.712.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>, Diego Novillo
 writes:
 >On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 14:28, Phil Edwards wrote:
 >> Somewhat re-ording your suggestions.
 >> 
 >> 
 >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 05:30:22PM -0700, Matt Austern wrote:
 >> >  1. Compile an unchanging piece of source code.
 >> 
 >> Anything in particular?  I don't much care what, but its build time
 >> multiplied by 5 needs to not be hellishly long.  (The machine is used for
 >> other things; and of course is can't be doing any of those other things
 >> while these tests are running.)
 >> 
 >I collected a bunch of .i files from the C front end and use that as my
 >unchanging code base.  It shouldn't take long to compile this 2-3 times
 >to get a good average.
FWIW, now that we have C++ working with tree-ssa we should probably
add the .ii files from libstdc++ to at least start looking at how
our changes are affecting C++ compile time.

jeff