Getting 3.3 out the door

[Wolfgang Bangerth]

> > Can I lobby a little for c++/9393? I only rediscovered this these days, so 
> 
> We've already fought about this one. :-)  See my "Release-Note" there.

Ah, sorry about that. I just missed it. I'll downgrade the priority then 
again.


> This one can't be fixed in the 3.3 time frame, I don't think.

Too bad. Do I get from your explanation in the PR, that the EDG frontend
basically computed a hash from its present compiler state to get a name
for anonymous namespaces? Also, why do these functions get external 
linkage at all?

W.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/