Reload bug

[Dale Johannesen]

On Thursday, April 10, 2003, at 01:01  PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> I think you're completely right: the reload pass has no specific
>> infrastructure for dealing with invalid subregs. It may "fix" these
>> subregs, but only if it happens that the operand needs reloading 
>> because
>> of the insn constraints.
>
> I've found why: the code has been disabled in find_reloads()
>
> 		  /* This following hunk of code should no longer be
> 		     needed at all with SUBREG_BYTE.  If you need this
> 		     code back, please explain to me why so I can
> 		     fix the real problem.  -DaveM */
>
> Re-enabling it fix PR target/10286.
>
> Now the question: what is the replacement machinery that is supposed 
> to be
> doing the work?

Ask DaveM?  He does seem to have volunteered.