Reload bug
Jan Hubicka
jh@suse.cz
Wed Apr 9 09:45:00 GMT 2003
> > No, it is valid for high parts too as long as the register is possible
> > (imagine the xmm being replaced by eax).
>
> Did I forget to say that this example is bogus? The logic doesn't of course
> trigger for %eax so we don't pessimize anything in that case.
What would prevent it from match on (subreg:DI (reg eax) 4)? That was
the original problem that made me to change the behaviour (we can't
reload instructions needing two such subregged operands in -fPIC as we
simply run out of registers)
Honza
>
> --
> Eric Botcazou
More information about the Gcc
mailing list