Problem with the fix to PR 10234
Joe Buck
jbuck@synopsys.com
Fri Apr 4 19:43:00 GMT 2003
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 11:17:49AM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote:
> I understand the desire for consistency among the components of the
> GNU Project. It's vitally important, though, for GCC to provide URLs
> that can be accessed reliably. I'd like to push back on this before
> reverting the patches.
You can hold off a little more, Gerald is still trying to convince
RMS. But we may have to do it. The deadline for deciding is the 3.2.3
release; by that release, either we need to put the old URL back or
we need to get permission to change it.
> Before changing back the URL in ICE messages I'd like to know what the
> problems were that caused the old URL to get only blank pages for a few
> days, and to have some assurances that the URL can be accessed reliably
> in the future.
We'll try to get a commitment from RMS that he lean on the webmasters
to be more responsive about fixing any problems. He was puzzled (as
was I) as to why a broken mirror wouldn't just have a stale copy, but
the key issue with me is that the FSF webmasters aren't diligent about
quickly responding to problems.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list